mirror of
https://github.com/jpetazzo/container.training.git
synced 2026-07-22 14:26:27 +00:00
266 lines
6.5 KiB
Markdown
266 lines
6.5 KiB
Markdown
# Securing the control plane
|
|
|
|
- Many components accept connections (and requests) from others:
|
|
|
|
- API server
|
|
|
|
- etcd
|
|
|
|
- kubelet
|
|
|
|
- We must secure these connections:
|
|
|
|
- to deny unauthorized requests
|
|
|
|
- to prevent eavesdropping secrets, tokens, and other sensitive information
|
|
|
|
- Disabling authentication and/or authorization is **strongly discouraged**
|
|
|
|
(but it's possible to do it, e.g. for learning / troubleshooting purposes)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Authentication and authorization
|
|
|
|
- Authentication (checking "who you are") is done with mutual TLS
|
|
|
|
(both the client and the server need to hold a valid certificate)
|
|
|
|
- Authorization (checking "what you can do") is done in different ways
|
|
|
|
- the API server implements a sophisticated permission logic (with RBAC)
|
|
|
|
- some services will defer authorization to the API server (through webhooks)
|
|
|
|
- some services require a certificate signed by a particular CA / sub-CA
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## In practice
|
|
|
|
- We will review the various communication channels in the control plane
|
|
|
|
- We will describe how they are secured
|
|
|
|
- When TLS certificates are used, we will indicate:
|
|
|
|
- which CA signs them
|
|
|
|
- what their subject (CN) should be, when applicable
|
|
|
|
- We will indicate how to configure security (client- and server-side)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## etcd peers
|
|
|
|
- Replication and coordination of etcd happens on a dedicated port
|
|
|
|
(typically port 2380; the default port for normal client connections is 2379)
|
|
|
|
- Authentication uses TLS certificates with a separate sub-CA
|
|
|
|
(otherwise, anyone with a Kubernetes client certificate could access etcd!)
|
|
|
|
- The etcd command line flags involved are:
|
|
|
|
`--peer-client-cert-auth=true` to activate it
|
|
|
|
`--peer-cert-file`, `--peer-key-file`, `--peer-trusted-ca-file`
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## etcd clients
|
|
|
|
- The only¹ thing that connects to etcd is the API server
|
|
|
|
- Authentication uses TLS certificates with a separate sub-CA
|
|
|
|
(for the same reasons as for etcd inter-peer authentication)
|
|
|
|
- The etcd command line flags involved are:
|
|
|
|
`--client-cert-auth=true` to activate it
|
|
|
|
`--trusted-ca-file`, `--cert-file`, `--key-file`
|
|
|
|
- The API server command line flags involved are:
|
|
|
|
`--etcd-cafile`, `--etcd-certfile`, `--etcd-keyfile`
|
|
|
|
.footnote[¹Technically, there is also the etcd healthcheck. Let's ignore it for now.]
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## API server clients
|
|
|
|
- The API server has a sophisticated authentication and authorization system
|
|
|
|
- For connections coming from other components of the control plane:
|
|
|
|
- authentication uses certificates (trusting the certificates' subject or CN)
|
|
|
|
- authorization uses whatever mechanism is enabled (most oftentimes, RBAC)
|
|
|
|
- The relevant API server flags are:
|
|
|
|
`--client-ca-file`, `--tls-cert-file`, `--tls-private-key-file`
|
|
|
|
- Each component connecting to the API server takes a `--kubeconfig` flag
|
|
|
|
(to specify a kubeconfig file containing the CA cert, client key, and client cert)
|
|
|
|
- Yes, that kubeconfig file follows the same format as our `~/.kube/config` file!
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Kubelet and API server
|
|
|
|
- Communication between kubelet and API server can be established both ways
|
|
|
|
- Kubelet → API server:
|
|
|
|
- kubelet registers itself ("hi, I'm node42, do you have work for me?")
|
|
|
|
- connection is kept open and re-established if it breaks
|
|
|
|
- that's how the kubelet knows which pods to start/stop
|
|
|
|
- API server → kubelet:
|
|
|
|
- used to retrieve logs, exec, attach to containers
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Kubelet → API server
|
|
|
|
- Kubelet is started with `--kubeconfig` with API server information
|
|
|
|
- The client certificate of the kubelet will typically have:
|
|
|
|
`CN=system:node:<nodename>` and groups `O=system:nodes`
|
|
|
|
- Nothing special on the API server side
|
|
|
|
(it will authenticate like any other client)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## API server → kubelet
|
|
|
|
- Kubelet is started with the flag `--client-ca-file`
|
|
|
|
(typically using the same CA as the API server)
|
|
|
|
- API server will use a dedicated key pair when contacting kubelet
|
|
|
|
(specified with `--kubelet-client-certificate` and `--kubelet-client-key`)
|
|
|
|
- Authorization uses webhooks
|
|
|
|
(enabled with `--authorization-mode=Webhook` on kubelet)
|
|
|
|
- The webhook server is the API server itself
|
|
|
|
(the kubelet sends back a request to the API server to ask, "can this person do that?")
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Scheduler
|
|
|
|
- The scheduler connects to the API server like an ordinary client
|
|
|
|
- The certificate of the scheduler will have `CN=system:kube-scheduler`
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Controller manager
|
|
|
|
- The controller manager is also a normal client to the API server
|
|
|
|
- Its certificate will have `CN=system:kube-controller-manager`
|
|
|
|
- If we use the CSR API, the controller manager needs the CA cert and key
|
|
|
|
(passed with flags `--cluster-signing-cert-file` and `--cluster-signing-key-file`)
|
|
|
|
- We usually want the controller manager to generate tokens for service accounts
|
|
|
|
- These tokens deserve some details (on the next slide!)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Service account tokens
|
|
|
|
- Each time we create a service account, the controller manager generates a token
|
|
|
|
- These tokens are JWT tokens, signed with a particular key
|
|
|
|
- These tokens are used for authentication with the API server
|
|
|
|
(and therefore, the API server needs to be able to verify their integrity)
|
|
|
|
- This uses another keypair:
|
|
|
|
- the private key (used for signature) is passed to the controller manager
|
|
<br/>(using flags `--service-account-private-key-file` and `--root-ca-file`)
|
|
|
|
- the public key (used for verification) is passed to the API server
|
|
<br/>(using flag `--service-account-key-file`)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## kube-proxy
|
|
|
|
- kube-proxy is "yet another API server client"
|
|
|
|
- In many clusters, it runs as a Daemon Set
|
|
|
|
- In that case, it will have its own Service Account and associated permissions
|
|
|
|
- It will authenticate using the token of that Service Account
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Webhooks
|
|
|
|
- We mentioned webhooks earlier; how does that really work?
|
|
|
|
- The Kubernetes API has special resource types to check permissions
|
|
|
|
- One of them is SubjectAccessReview
|
|
|
|
- To check if a particular user can do a particular action on a particular resource:
|
|
|
|
- we prepare a SubjectAccessReview object
|
|
|
|
- we send that object to the API server
|
|
|
|
- the API server responds with allow/deny (and optional explanations)
|
|
|
|
- Using webhooks for authorization = sending SAR to authorize each request
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Subject Access Review
|
|
|
|
Here is an example showing how to check if `jean.doe` can `get` some `pods` in `kube-system`:
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
kubectl -v9 create -f- <<EOF
|
|
apiVersion: authorization.k8s.io/v1beta1
|
|
kind: SubjectAccessReview
|
|
spec:
|
|
user: jean.doe
|
|
group:
|
|
- foo
|
|
- bar
|
|
resourceAttributes:
|
|
#group: blah.k8s.io
|
|
namespace: kube-system
|
|
resource: pods
|
|
verb: get
|
|
#name: web-xyz1234567-pqr89
|
|
EOF
|
|
```
|