Files
container.training/slides/k8s/authn-authz.md
Jerome Petazzoni 7d6ab6974d Big autopilot update
'keys' does not handle special keys (like ^J) anymore.
Instead, we should use `key`, which will pass its entire
argument to tmux, without any processing. It is therefore
possible to do something like:

```key ^C```

Or

```key Escape```

Most (if not all) calls to special keys have been
converted to use 'key' instead of 'keys'.

Action ```copypaste``` has been deprecated in favor
of three separate actions:

```copy REGEX``` (searches the regex in the active pane,
and if found, places it in an internal clipboard)

```paste``` (inserts the content of the clipboard as
keystrokes)

```check``` (forces a status check)

Also, a 'tmux' command has been added. It allows to
do stuff like:

```tmux split-pane -v```
2020-01-18 09:49:18 -06:00

679 lines
16 KiB
Markdown

# Authentication and authorization
*And first, a little refresher!*
- Authentication = verifying the identity of a person
On a UNIX system, we can authenticate with login+password, SSH keys ...
- Authorization = listing what they are allowed to do
On a UNIX system, this can include file permissions, sudoer entries ...
- Sometimes abbreviated as "authn" and "authz"
- In good modular systems, these things are decoupled
(so we can e.g. change a password or SSH key without having to reset access rights)
---
## Authentication in Kubernetes
- When the API server receives a request, it tries to authenticate it
(it examines headers, certificates... anything available)
- Many authentication methods are available and can be used simultaneously
(we will see them on the next slide)
- It's the job of the authentication method to produce:
- the user name
- the user ID
- a list of groups
- The API server doesn't interpret these; that'll be the job of *authorizers*
---
## Authentication methods
- TLS client certificates
(that's what we've been doing with `kubectl` so far)
- Bearer tokens
(a secret token in the HTTP headers of the request)
- [HTTP basic auth](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_access_authentication)
(carrying user and password in an HTTP header)
- Authentication proxy
(sitting in front of the API and setting trusted headers)
---
## Anonymous requests
- If any authentication method *rejects* a request, it's denied
(`401 Unauthorized` HTTP code)
- If a request is neither rejected nor accepted by anyone, it's anonymous
- the user name is `system:anonymous`
- the list of groups is `[system:unauthenticated]`
- By default, the anonymous user can't do anything
(that's what you get if you just `curl` the Kubernetes API)
---
## Authentication with TLS certificates
- This is enabled in most Kubernetes deployments
- The user name is derived from the `CN` in the client certificates
- The groups are derived from the `O` fields in the client certificate
- From the point of view of the Kubernetes API, users do not exist
(i.e. they are not stored in etcd or anywhere else)
- Users can be created (and added to groups) independently of the API
- The Kubernetes API can be set up to use your custom CA to validate client certs
---
class: extra-details
## Viewing our admin certificate
- Let's inspect the certificate we've been using all this time!
.exercise[
- This command will show the `CN` and `O` fields for our certificate:
```bash
kubectl config view \
--raw \
-o json \
| jq -r .users[0].user[\"client-certificate-data\"] \
| openssl base64 -d -A \
| openssl x509 -text \
| grep Subject:
```
]
Let's break down that command together! 😅
---
class: extra-details
## Breaking down the command
- `kubectl config view` shows the Kubernetes user configuration
- `--raw` includes certificate information (which shows as REDACTED otherwise)
- `-o json` outputs the information in JSON format
- `| jq ...` extracts the field with the user certificate (in base64)
- `| openssl base64 -d -A` decodes the base64 format (now we have a PEM file)
- `| openssl x509 -text` parses the certificate and outputs it as plain text
- `| grep Subject:` shows us the line that interests us
→ We are user `kubernetes-admin`, in group `system:masters`.
(We will see later how and why this gives us the permissions that we have.)
---
## User certificates in practice
- The Kubernetes API server does not support certificate revocation
(see issue [#18982](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/18982))
- As a result, we don't have an easy way to terminate someone's access
(if their key is compromised, or they leave the organization)
- Option 1: re-create a new CA and re-issue everyone's certificates
<br/>
→ Maybe OK if we only have a few users; no way otherwise
- Option 2: don't use groups; grant permissions to individual users
<br/>
→ Inconvenient if we have many users and teams; error-prone
- Option 3: issue short-lived certificates (e.g. 24 hours) and renew them often
<br/>
→ This can be facilitated by e.g. Vault or by the Kubernetes CSR API
---
## Authentication with tokens
- Tokens are passed as HTTP headers:
`Authorization: Bearer and-then-here-comes-the-token`
- Tokens can be validated through a number of different methods:
- static tokens hard-coded in a file on the API server
- [bootstrap tokens](https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/bootstrap-tokens/) (special case to create a cluster or join nodes)
- [OpenID Connect tokens](https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/authentication/#openid-connect-tokens) (to delegate authentication to compatible OAuth2 providers)
- service accounts (these deserve more details, coming right up!)
---
## Service accounts
- A service account is a user that exists in the Kubernetes API
(it is visible with e.g. `kubectl get serviceaccounts`)
- Service accounts can therefore be created / updated dynamically
(they don't require hand-editing a file and restarting the API server)
- A service account is associated with a set of secrets
(the kind that you can view with `kubectl get secrets`)
- Service accounts are generally used to grant permissions to applications, services...
(as opposed to humans)
---
class: extra-details
## Token authentication in practice
- We are going to list existing service accounts
- Then we will extract the token for a given service account
- And we will use that token to authenticate with the API
---
class: extra-details
## Listing service accounts
.exercise[
- The resource name is `serviceaccount` or `sa` for short:
```bash
kubectl get sa
```
]
There should be just one service account in the default namespace: `default`.
---
class: extra-details
## Finding the secret
.exercise[
- List the secrets for the `default` service account:
```bash
kubectl get sa default -o yaml
SECRET=$(kubectl get sa default -o json | jq -r .secrets[0].name)
```
]
It should be named `default-token-XXXXX`.
---
class: extra-details
## Extracting the token
- The token is stored in the secret, wrapped with base64 encoding
.exercise[
- View the secret:
```bash
kubectl get secret $SECRET -o yaml
```
- Extract the token and decode it:
```bash
TOKEN=$(kubectl get secret $SECRET -o json \
| jq -r .data.token | openssl base64 -d -A)
```
]
---
class: extra-details
## Using the token
- Let's send a request to the API, without and with the token
.exercise[
- Find the ClusterIP for the `kubernetes` service:
```bash
kubectl get svc kubernetes
API=$(kubectl get svc kubernetes -o json | jq -r .spec.clusterIP)
```
- Connect without the token:
```bash
curl -k https://$API
```
- Connect with the token:
```bash
curl -k -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" https://$API
```
]
---
class: extra-details
## Results
- In both cases, we will get a "Forbidden" error
- Without authentication, the user is `system:anonymous`
- With authentication, it is shown as `system:serviceaccount:default:default`
- The API "sees" us as a different user
- But neither user has any rights, so we can't do nothin'
- Let's change that!
---
## Authorization in Kubernetes
- There are multiple ways to grant permissions in Kubernetes, called [authorizers](https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/authorization/#authorization-modules):
- [Node Authorization](https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/node/) (used internally by kubelet; we can ignore it)
- [Attribute-based access control](https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/abac/) (powerful but complex and static; ignore it too)
- [Webhook](https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/webhook/) (each API request is submitted to an external service for approval)
- [Role-based access control](https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/rbac/) (associates permissions to users dynamically)
- The one we want is the last one, generally abbreviated as RBAC
---
## Role-based access control
- RBAC allows to specify fine-grained permissions
- Permissions are expressed as *rules*
- A rule is a combination of:
- [verbs](https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/authorization/#determine-the-request-verb) like create, get, list, update, delete...
- resources (as in "API resource," like pods, nodes, services...)
- resource names (to specify e.g. one specific pod instead of all pods)
- in some case, [subresources](https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/rbac/#referring-to-resources) (e.g. logs are subresources of pods)
---
## From rules to roles to rolebindings
- A *role* is an API object containing a list of *rules*
Example: role "external-load-balancer-configurator" can:
- [list, get] resources [endpoints, services, pods]
- [update] resources [services]
- A *rolebinding* associates a role with a user
Example: rolebinding "external-load-balancer-configurator":
- associates user "external-load-balancer-configurator"
- with role "external-load-balancer-configurator"
- Yes, there can be users, roles, and rolebindings with the same name
- It's a good idea for 1-1-1 bindings; not so much for 1-N ones
---
## Cluster-scope permissions
- API resources Role and RoleBinding are for objects within a namespace
- We can also define API resources ClusterRole and ClusterRoleBinding
- These are a superset, allowing us to:
- specify actions on cluster-wide objects (like nodes)
- operate across all namespaces
- We can create Role and RoleBinding resources within a namespace
- ClusterRole and ClusterRoleBinding resources are global
---
## Pods and service accounts
- A pod can be associated with a service account
- by default, it is associated with the `default` service account
- as we saw earlier, this service account has no permissions anyway
- The associated token is exposed to the pod's filesystem
(in `/var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/token`)
- Standard Kubernetes tooling (like `kubectl`) will look for it there
- So Kubernetes tools running in a pod will automatically use the service account
---
## In practice
- We are going to create a service account
- We will use a default cluster role (`view`)
- We will bind together this role and this service account
- Then we will run a pod using that service account
- In this pod, we will install `kubectl` and check our permissions
---
## Creating a service account
- We will call the new service account `viewer`
(note that nothing prevents us from calling it `view`, like the role)
.exercise[
- Create the new service account:
```bash
kubectl create serviceaccount viewer
```
- List service accounts now:
```bash
kubectl get serviceaccounts
```
]
---
## Binding a role to the service account
- Binding a role = creating a *rolebinding* object
- We will call that object `viewercanview`
(but again, we could call it `view`)
.exercise[
- Create the new role binding:
```bash
kubectl create rolebinding viewercanview \
--clusterrole=view \
--serviceaccount=default:viewer
```
]
It's important to note a couple of details in these flags...
---
## Roles vs Cluster Roles
- We used `--clusterrole=view`
- What would have happened if we had used `--role=view`?
- we would have bound the role `view` from the local namespace
<br/>(instead of the cluster role `view`)
- the command would have worked fine (no error)
- but later, our API requests would have been denied
- This is a deliberate design decision
(we can reference roles that don't exist, and create/update them later)
---
## Users vs Service Accounts
- We used `--serviceaccount=default:viewer`
- What would have happened if we had used `--user=default:viewer`?
- we would have bound the role to a user instead of a service account
- again, the command would have worked fine (no error)
- ...but our API requests would have been denied later
- What's about the `default:` prefix?
- that's the namespace of the service account
- yes, it could be inferred from context, but... `kubectl` requires it
---
## Testing
- We will run an `alpine` pod and install `kubectl` there
.exercise[
- Run a one-time pod:
```bash
kubectl run eyepod --rm -ti --restart=Never \
--serviceaccount=viewer \
--image alpine
```
- Install `curl`, then use it to install `kubectl`:
```bash
apk add --no-cache curl
URLBASE=https://storage.googleapis.com/kubernetes-release/release
KUBEVER=$(curl -s $URLBASE/stable.txt)
curl -LO $URLBASE/$KUBEVER/bin/linux/amd64/kubectl
chmod +x kubectl
```
]
---
## Running `kubectl` in the pod
- We'll try to use our `view` permissions, then to create an object
.exercise[
- Check that we can, indeed, view things:
```bash
./kubectl get all
```
- But that we can't create things:
```
./kubectl create deployment testrbac --image=nginx
```
- Exit the container with `exit` or `^D`
<!-- ```key ^D``` -->
]
---
## Testing directly with `kubectl`
- We can also check for permission with `kubectl auth can-i`:
```bash
kubectl auth can-i list nodes
kubectl auth can-i create pods
kubectl auth can-i get pod/name-of-pod
kubectl auth can-i get /url-fragment-of-api-request/
kubectl auth can-i '*' services
```
- And we can check permissions on behalf of other users:
```bash
kubectl auth can-i list nodes \
--as some-user
kubectl auth can-i list nodes \
--as system:serviceaccount:<namespace>:<name-of-service-account>
```
---
class: extra-details
## Where does this `view` role come from?
- Kubernetes defines a number of ClusterRoles intended to be bound to users
- `cluster-admin` can do *everything* (think `root` on UNIX)
- `admin` can do *almost everything* (except e.g. changing resource quotas and limits)
- `edit` is similar to `admin`, but cannot view or edit permissions
- `view` has read-only access to most resources, except permissions and secrets
*In many situations, these roles will be all you need.*
*You can also customize them!*
---
class: extra-details
## Customizing the default roles
- If you need to *add* permissions to these default roles (or others),
<br/>
you can do it through the [ClusterRole Aggregation](https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/rbac/#aggregated-clusterroles) mechanism
- This happens by creating a ClusterRole with the following labels:
```yaml
metadata:
labels:
rbac.authorization.k8s.io/aggregate-to-admin: "true"
rbac.authorization.k8s.io/aggregate-to-edit: "true"
rbac.authorization.k8s.io/aggregate-to-view: "true"
```
- This ClusterRole permissions will be added to `admin`/`edit`/`view` respectively
- This is particulary useful when using CustomResourceDefinitions
(since Kubernetes cannot guess which resources are sensitive and which ones aren't)
---
class: extra-details
## Where do our permissions come from?
- When interacting with the Kubernetes API, we are using a client certificate
- We saw previously that this client certificate contained:
`CN=kubernetes-admin` and `O=system:masters`
- Let's look for these in existing ClusterRoleBindings:
```bash
kubectl get clusterrolebindings -o yaml |
grep -e kubernetes-admin -e system:masters
```
(`system:masters` should show up, but not `kubernetes-admin`.)
- Where does this match come from?
---
class: extra-details
## The `system:masters` group
- If we eyeball the output of `kubectl get clusterrolebindings -o yaml`, we'll find out!
- It is in the `cluster-admin` binding:
```bash
kubectl describe clusterrolebinding cluster-admin
```
- This binding associates `system:masters` with the cluster role `cluster-admin`
- And the `cluster-admin` is, basically, `root`:
```bash
kubectl describe clusterrole cluster-admin
```
---
class: extra-details
## Figuring out who can do what
- For auditing purposes, sometimes we want to know who can perform an action
- There are a few tools to help us with that
- [kubectl-who-can](https://github.com/aquasecurity/kubectl-who-can) by Aqua Security
- [Review Access (aka Rakkess)](https://github.com/corneliusweig/rakkess)
- Both are available as standalone programs, or as plugins for `kubectl`
(`kubectl` plugins can be installed and managed with `krew`)