Files
container.training/slides/kube/rollout.md
2018-07-10 07:37:39 -05:00

308 lines
6.3 KiB
Markdown

# Rolling updates
- By default (without rolling updates), when a scaled resource is updated:
- new pods are created
- old pods are terminated
- ... all at the same time
- if something goes wrong, ¯\\\_(ツ)\_/¯
---
## Rolling updates
- With rolling updates, when a resource is updated, it happens progressively
- Two parameters determine the pace of the rollout: `maxUnavailable` and `maxSurge`
- They can be specified in absolute number of pods, or percentage of the `replicas` count
- At any given time ...
- there will always be at least `replicas`-`maxUnavailable` pods available
- there will never be more than `replicas`+`maxSurge` pods in total
- there will therefore be up to `maxUnavailable`+`maxSurge` pods being updated
- We have the possibility to rollback to the previous version
<br/>(if the update fails or is unsatisfactory in any way)
---
## Checking current rollout parameters
- Recall how we build custom reports with `kubectl` and `jq`:
.exercise[
- Show the rollout plan for our deployments:
```bash
kubectl get deploy -o json |
jq ".items[] | {name:.metadata.name} + .spec.strategy.rollingUpdate"
```
]
---
## Rolling updates in practice
- As of Kubernetes 1.8, we can do rolling updates with:
`deployments`, `daemonsets`, `statefulsets`
- Editing one of these resources will automatically result in a rolling update
- Rolling updates can be monitored with the `kubectl rollout` subcommand
---
## Building a new version of the `worker` service
.exercise[
- Go to the `stack` directory:
```bash
cd ~/container.training/stacks
```
- Edit `dockercoins/worker/worker.py`, update the `sleep` line to sleep 1 second
- Build a new tag and push it to the registry:
```bash
#export REGISTRY=localhost:3xxxx
export TAG=v0.2
docker-compose -f dockercoins.yml build
docker-compose -f dockercoins.yml push
```
]
---
## Rolling out the new `worker` service
.exercise[
- Let's monitor what's going on by opening a few terminals, and run:
```bash
kubectl get pods -w
kubectl get replicasets -w
kubectl get deployments -w
```
<!-- ```keys ^C``` -->
- Update `worker` either with `kubectl edit`, or by running:
```bash
kubectl set image deploy worker worker=$REGISTRY/worker:$TAG
```
]
--
That rollout should be pretty quick. What shows in the web UI?
---
## Give it some time
- At first, it looks like nothing is happening (the graph remains at the same level)
- According to `kubectl get deploy -w`, the `deployment` was updated really quickly
- But `kubectl get pods -w` tells a different story
- The old `pods` are still here, and they stay in `Terminating` state for a while
- Eventually, they are terminated; and then the graph decreases significantly
- This delay is due to the fact that our worker doesn't handle signals
- Kubernetes sends a "polite" shutdown request to the worker, which ignores it
- After a grace period, Kubernetes gets impatient and kills the container
(The grace period is 30 seconds, but [can be changed](https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/workloads/pods/pod/#termination-of-pods) if needed)
---
## Rolling out something invalid
- What happens if we make a mistake?
.exercise[
- Update `worker` by specifying a non-existent image:
```bash
export TAG=v0.3
kubectl set image deploy worker worker=$REGISTRY/worker:$TAG
```
- Check what's going on:
```bash
kubectl rollout status deploy worker
```
]
--
Our rollout is stuck. However, the app is not dead (just 10% slower).
---
## What's going on with our rollout?
- Why is our app 10% slower?
- Because `MaxUnavailable=1`, so the rollout terminated 1 replica out of 10 available
- Okay, but why do we see 2 new replicas being rolled out?
- Because `MaxSurge=1`, so in addition to replacing the terminated one, the rollout is also starting one more
---
class: extra-details
## The nitty-gritty details
- We start with 10 pods running for the `worker` deployment
- Current settings: MaxUnavailable=1 and MaxSurge=1
- When we start the rollout:
- one replica is taken down (as per MaxUnavailable=1)
- another is created (with the new version) to replace it
- another is created (with the new version) per MaxSurge=1
- Now we have 9 replicas up and running, and 2 being deployed
- Our rollout is stuck at this point!
---
## Checking the dashboard during the bad rollout
.exercise[
- Check which port the dashboard is on:
```bash
kubectl -n kube-system get svc socat
```
]
Note the `3xxxx` port.
.exercise[
- Connect to http://oneofournodes:3xxxx/
<!-- ```open https://node1:3xxxx/``` -->
]
--
- We have failures in Deployments, Pods, and Replica Sets
---
## Recovering from a bad rollout
- We could push some `v0.3` image
(the pod retry logic will eventually catch it and the rollout will proceed)
- Or we could invoke a manual rollback
.exercise[
<!--
```keys
^C
```
-->
- Cancel the deployment and wait for the dust to settle down:
```bash
kubectl rollout undo deploy worker
kubectl rollout status deploy worker
```
]
---
## Changing rollout parameters
- We want to:
- revert to `v0.1`
- be conservative on availability (always have desired number of available workers)
- be aggressive on rollout speed (update more than one pod at a time)
- give some time to our workers to "warm up" before starting more
The corresponding changes can be expressed in the following YAML snippet:
.small[
```yaml
spec:
template:
spec:
containers:
- name: worker
image: $REGISTRY/worker:v0.1
strategy:
rollingUpdate:
maxUnavailable: 0
maxSurge: 3
minReadySeconds: 10
```
]
---
## Applying changes through a YAML patch
- We could use `kubectl edit deployment worker`
- But we could also use `kubectl patch` with the exact YAML shown before
.exercise[
.small[
- Apply all our changes and wait for them to take effect:
```bash
kubectl patch deployment worker -p "
spec:
template:
spec:
containers:
- name: worker
image: $REGISTRY/worker:v0.1
strategy:
rollingUpdate:
maxUnavailable: 0
maxSurge: 3
minReadySeconds: 10
"
kubectl rollout status deployment worker
kubectl get deploy -o json worker |
jq "{name:.metadata.name} + .spec.strategy.rollingUpdate"
```
]
]