Add course conclusion

This commit is contained in:
Jerome Petazzoni
2019-04-13 11:45:08 -05:00
parent 2dc634e1f5
commit 1e77f57434

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,210 @@
# What's next?
- Congratulations!
- We learned a lot about Kubernetes, its internals, its advanced concepts
--
- That was just the easy part
- The hard challenges will revolve around *culture* and *people*
--
- ... What does that mean?
---
## Running an app involves many steps
- Write the app
- Tests, QA ...
- Ship *something* (more on that later)
- Provision resources (e.g. VMs, clusters)
- Deploy the *something* on the resources
- Manage, maintain, monitor the resources
- Manage, maintain, monitor the app
- And much more
---
## Who does what?
- The old "devs vs ops" division has changed
- In some organizations, "ops" are now called "SRE" or "platform" teams
(and they have very different sets of skills)
- Do you know which team is responsible for each item on the list on the previous page?
- Acknowledge that a lot of tasks are outsourced
(e.g. if we add "buy / rack / provision machines" in that list)
---
## What do we ship?
- Some organizations embrace "you build it, you run it"
- When "build" and "run" are owned by different teams, where's the line?
- What does the "build" team ship to the "run" team?
- Let's see a few options, and what they imply
---
## Shipping code
- Team "build" ships code
(hopefully in a repository, identified by a commit hash)
- Team "run" containerizes that code
✔️ no extra work for developers
❌ very little advantage of using containers
---
## Shipping container images
- Team "build" ships container images
(hopefully built automatically from a source repository)
- Team "run" uses theses images to create e.g. Kubernetes resources
✔️ universal artefact (support all languages uniformly)
✔️ easy to start a single component (good for monoliths)
❌ complex applications will require a lot of extra work
❌ adding/removing components in the stack also requires extra work
❌ complex applications will run very differently between dev and prod
---
## Shipping Compose files
(Or another kind of dev-centric manifest)
- Team "build" ships a manifest that works on a single node
(as well as images, or ways to build them)
- Team "run" adapts that manifest to work on a cluster
✔️ all teams can start the stack in a reliable, deterministic manner
❌ adding/removing components still requires *some* work (but less than before)
❌ there will be *some* differences between dev and prod
---
## Shipping Kubernetes manifests
- Team "build" ships ready-to-run manifests
(YAML, Helm Charts, Kustomize ...)
- Team "run" adjusts some parameters and monitors the application
✔️ parity between dev and prod environments
✔️ "run" team can focus on SLAs, SLOs, and overall quality
❌ requires *a lot* of extra work (and new skills) from the "build" team
❌ Kubernetes is not a very convenient development platform (at least, not yet)
---
## What's the right answer?
- It depends on our teams
- existing skills (do they know how to do it?)
- availability (do they have the time to do it?)
- potential skills (can they learn to do it?)
- It depends on our culture
- owning "run" often implies being on call
- do we reward on-call duty without encouraging hero syndrome?
- do we give resources (time, money) to people to learn?
---
class: extra-details
## Tools to develop on Kubernetes
*If we decide to make Kubernetes the primary development platform, here
are a few tools that can help us.*
- Docker Desktop
- Draft
- Minikube
- Skaffold
- Tilt
- ...
---
## Where do we run?
- Managed vs. self-hosted
- Cloud vs. on-premises
- If cloud: public vs. private
- Which vendor / distribution to pick?
- Which versions / features to enable?
---
## Some guidelines
- Start small
- Outsource what we don't know
- Start simple, and stay simple as long as possible
(try to stay away from complex features that we don't need)
- Automate
(regularly check that we can successfully redeploy by following scripts)
- Transfer knowledge
(make sure everyone is on the same page / same level)
- Iterate!