This commit introduces a standardized Pull Request template to help
contributors submit clear and consistent PRs.
The template includes sections for describing the change, testing
instructions, acceptance criteria, and related issues.
It aims to improve collaboration, streamline reviews, and reduce
misunderstandings by ensuring all relevant context is provided up front.
Final proposal for this PR (for now): the lab request template.
I foresee this one becoming the most used within the next couple of years.
Hoping this is enough.
Refs: [discussion](https://github.com/nishanb/CK-X/discussions/15_)
As decided in the related discussion: we will start with 3 simple issue
templates and iterate from there.
This one introduces the feature request template.
Refs: [discussion](https://github.com/nishanb/CK-X/discussions/15_)
As suggested @nishanb, this small enhancement allows users to copy the
port number directly, aligning with the expected behavior of the web page.
Refs: #10
The original question did not specify all the evaluated conditions.
Now the user is fully informed about the exercise requirements and can
proceed with the exam accordingly.
Refs: #10
The previous command used process substitution:
bash <(curl -fsSL ...)
This can fail on some systems due to how /dev/fd handles file descriptors,
especially when using sudo. The new approach uses a pipe instead:
curl -fsSL ... | sudo bash
This is more portable and avoids permission issues related to temp files.
