docs(anonymization): keep the non-conformant 192.168.1.10 example

Revert an over-eager sanitization: this paragraph explains *why* RFC-1918 ranges
make poor placeholders, and deliberately uses 192.168.1.10 as the
non-conformant counter-example. Rewriting it to an RFC-5737 address defeated the
point (192.0.2.10 is obviously a documentation placeholder). Restore the
illustrative bad example.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Tobias Gesellchen
2026-06-06 19:11:24 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 4.8
parent 9bfe2a1a08
commit 44f3ccfc18
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ pattern) but stay numeric for parsers that expect integer-looking IDs.
An earlier anonymisation pass used `192.168.1.x` as its target. That
range is RFC-1918 private space — perfectly valid on real networks,
which means a reader can't tell whether `192.0.2.10` is a
which means a reader can't tell whether `192.168.1.10` is a
placeholder or a documented LAN address. RFC-5737 ranges fix that:
because they're reserved for documentation only, any reader knows on
sight that they don't represent a real device.