woodpecker

github/woodpecker

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker.git synced 2026-04-15 01:41:56 +00:00

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Robert KaussowandGitHub	a779eed3df	Enable golangci linter gomnd (#3171 )	2024-03-15 18:00:25 +01:00
qwerty287andGitHub	cb3efd2cd9	Simplify store interfaces (#3437 ) Use `store.Store` interface if possible.	2024-02-25 10:37:10 +01:00
6543andGitHub	a63135363b	Step status update dont set to running again once it got stoped (#3151 ) Because of the check `if step.Stopped == 0` without the check there are edgecases where could be the case a stoped steped can be markt as running again, witch is wrong. I do remember we have "running" steps indefinetly in cancled pipelines. This could be the fix, i just did not test that specific. Anyway the func hat a good testcoverage ... so just look at the tests _Source: https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/pull/3143#discussion_r1446138088_	2024-01-09 18:34:55 +01:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Robert KaussowandGitHub

a779eed3df

Enable golangci linter gomnd (#3171 )

2024-03-15 18:00:25 +01:00

qwerty287andGitHub

cb3efd2cd9

Simplify store interfaces (#3437 )

Use `store.Store` interface if possible.

2024-02-25 10:37:10 +01:00

6543andGitHub

a63135363b

Step status update dont set to running again once it got stoped (#3151 )

Because of the check `if step.Stopped == 0`

without the check there are edgecases where could be the case a stoped
steped can be markt as running again, witch is wrong.

I do remember we have "running" steps indefinetly in cancled pipelines.
This could be the fix, i just did not test that specific.

Anyway the func hat a good testcoverage ... so just look at the tests

_Source:
https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/pull/3143#discussion_r1446138088_

2024-01-09 18:34:55 +01:00