diff --git a/docs/gitbook/tutorials/canary-helm-gitops.md b/docs/gitbook/tutorials/canary-helm-gitops.md index 9633c8bf..8e553d76 100644 --- a/docs/gitbook/tutorials/canary-helm-gitops.md +++ b/docs/gitbook/tutorials/canary-helm-gitops.md @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ helm upgrade -i frontend flagger/podinfo/ \ --reuse-values \ --set canary.loadtest.enabled=true \ --set canary.helmtest.enabled=true \ ---set image.tag=1.4.1 +--set image.tag=1.7.1 ``` Flagger detects that the deployment revision changed and starts the canary analysis: @@ -283,17 +283,17 @@ metadata: namespace: test annotations: flux.weave.works/automated: "true" - flux.weave.works/tag.chart-image: semver:~1.4 + flux.weave.works/tag.chart-image: semver:~1.7 spec: releaseName: frontend chart: repository: https://stefanprodan.github.io/flagger/ name: podinfo - version: 2.0.0 + version: 2.3.0 values: image: repository: quay.io/stefanprodan/podinfo - tag: 1.4.0 + tag: 1.7.0 backend: http://backend-podinfo:9898/echo canary: enabled: true @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ In the `chart` section I've defined the release source by specifying the Helm re In the `values` section I've overwritten the defaults set in values.yaml. With the `flux.weave.works` annotations I instruct Flux to automate this release. -When an image tag in the sem ver range of `1.4.0 - 1.4.99` is pushed to Quay, +When an image tag in the sem ver range of `1.7.0 - 1.7.99` is pushed to Quay, Flux will upgrade the Helm release and from there Flagger will pick up the change and start a canary deployment. Install [Weave Flux](https://github.com/weaveworks/flux) and its Helm Operator by specifying your Git repo URL: @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ helm repo add weaveworks https://weaveworks.github.io/flux helm install --name flux \ --set helmOperator.create=true \ +--set helmOperator.createCRD=true \ --set git.url=git@github.com:/ \ --namespace flux \ weaveworks/flux @@ -343,9 +344,9 @@ launch the `frontend` and `backend` apps. A CI/CD pipeline for the `frontend` release could look like this: -* cut a release from the master branch of the podinfo code repo with the git tag `1.4.1` +* cut a release from the master branch of the podinfo code repo with the git tag `1.7.1` * CI builds the image and pushes the `podinfo:1.7.1` image to the container registry -* Flux scans the registry and updates the Helm release `image.tag` to `1.4.1` +* Flux scans the registry and updates the Helm release `image.tag` to `1.7.1` * Flux commits and push the change to the cluster repo * Flux applies the updated Helm release on the cluster * Flux Helm Operator picks up the change and calls Tiller to upgrade the release @@ -355,7 +356,7 @@ A CI/CD pipeline for the `frontend` release could look like this: * Based on the analysis result the canary deployment is promoted to production or rolled back * Flagger sends a Slack notification with the canary result -If the canary fails, fix the bug, do another patch release eg `1.4.2` and the whole process will run again. +If the canary fails, fix the bug, do another patch release eg `1.7.2` and the whole process will run again. A canary deployment can fail due to any of the following reasons: