# Kubernetes concepts - Kubernetes is a container management system - It runs and manages containerized applications on a cluster -- - What does that really mean? --- ## What can we do with Kubernetes? - Let's imagine that we have a 3-tier e-commerce app: - web frontend - API backend - database (that we will keep out of Kubernetes for now) - We have built images for our frontend and backend components (e.g. with Dockerfiles and `docker build`) - We are running them successfully with a local environment (e.g. with Docker Compose) - Let's see how we would deploy our app on Kubernetes! --- ## Basic things we can ask Kubernetes to do -- - Start 5 containers using image `atseashop/api:v1.3` -- - Place an internal load balancer in front of these containers -- - Start 10 containers using image `atseashop/webfront:v1.3` -- - Place a public load balancer in front of these containers -- - It's Black Friday (or Christmas), traffic spikes, grow our cluster and add containers -- - New release! Replace my containers with the new image `atseashop/webfront:v1.4` -- - Keep processing requests during the upgrade; update my containers one at a time --- ## Other things that Kubernetes can do for us - Autoscaling (straightforward on CPU; more complex on other metrics) - Resource management and scheduling (reserve CPU/RAM for containers; placement constraints) - Advanced rollout patterns (blue/green deployment, canary deployment) --- ## More things that Kubernetes can do for us - Batch jobs (one-off; parallel; also cron-style periodic execution) - Fine-grained access control (defining *what* can be done by *whom* on *which* resources) - Stateful services (databases, message queues, etc.) - Automating complex tasks with *operators* (e.g. database replication, failover, etc.) --- ## Kubernetes architecture --- class: pic ![haha only kidding](images/k8s-arch1.png) --- ## Kubernetes architecture - Ha ha ha ha - OK, I was trying to scare you, it's much simpler than that ❤️ --- class: pic ![that one is more like the real thing](images/k8s-arch2.png) --- ## Credits - The first schema is a Kubernetes cluster with storage backed by multi-path iSCSI (Courtesy of [Yongbok Kim](https://www.yongbok.net/blog/)) - The second one is a simplified representation of a Kubernetes cluster (Courtesy of [Imesh Gunaratne](https://medium.com/containermind/a-reference-architecture-for-deploying-wso2-middleware-on-kubernetes-d4dee7601e8e)) --- ## Kubernetes architecture: the nodes - The nodes executing our containers run a collection of services: - a container Engine (typically Docker) - kubelet (the "node agent") - kube-proxy (a necessary but not sufficient network component) - Nodes were formerly called "minions" (You might see that word in older articles or documentation) --- ## Kubernetes architecture: the control plane - The Kubernetes logic (its "brains") is a collection of services: - the API server (our point of entry to everything!) - core services like the scheduler and controller manager - `etcd` (a highly available key/value store; the "database" of Kubernetes) - Together, these services form the control plane of our cluster - The control plane is also called the "master" --- class: pic ![One of the best Kubernetes architecture diagrams available](images/k8s-arch4-thanks-luxas.png) --- class: extra-details ## Running the control plane on special nodes - It is common to reserve a dedicated node for the control plane (Except for single-node development clusters, like when using minikube) - This node is then called a "master" (Yes, this is ambiguous: is the "master" a node, or the whole control plane?) - Normal applications are restricted from running on this node (By using a mechanism called ["taints"](https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/configuration/taint-and-toleration/)) - When high availability is required, each service of the control plane must be resilient - The control plane is then replicated on multiple nodes (This is sometimes called a "multi-master" setup) --- class: extra-details ## Running the control plane outside containers - The services of the control plane can run in or out of containers - For instance: since `etcd` is a critical service, some people deploy it directly on a dedicated cluster (without containers) (This is illustrated on the first "super complicated" schema) - In some hosted Kubernetes offerings (e.g. AKS, GKE, EKS), the control plane is invisible (We only "see" a Kubernetes API endpoint) - In that case, there is no "master node" *For this reason, it is more accurate to say "control plane" rather than "master."* --- class: extra-details ## How many nodes should a cluster have? - There is no particular constraint (no need to have an odd number of nodes for quorum) - A cluster can have zero node (but then it won't be able to start any pods) - For testing and development, having a single node is fine - For production, make sure that you have extra capacity (so that your workload still fits if you lose a node or a group of nodes) - Kubernetes is tested with [up to 5000 nodes](https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/best-practices/cluster-large/) (however, running a cluster of that size requires a lot of tuning) --- class: extra-details ## Do we need to run Docker at all? No! -- - By default, Kubernetes uses the Docker Engine to run containers - We can leverage other pluggable runtimes through the *Container Runtime Interface* - We could also use `rkt` ("Rocket") from CoreOS (deprecated) --- class: extra-details ## Some runtimes available through CRI - [containerd](https://github.com/containerd/containerd/blob/master/README.md) - maintained by Docker, IBM, and community - used by Docker Engine, microk8s, k3s, GKE; also standalone - comes with its own CLI, `ctr` - [CRI-O](https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o/blob/master/README.md): - maintained by Red Hat, SUSE, and community - used by OpenShift and Kubic - designed specifically as a minimal runtime for Kubernetes - [And more](https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/production-environment/container-runtimes/) --- class: extra-details ## Do we need to run Docker at all? Yes! -- - In this workshop, we run our app on a single node first - We will need to build images and ship them around - We can do these things without Docker
(and get diagnosed with NIH¹ syndrome) - Docker is still the most stable container engine today
(but other options are maturing very quickly) .footnote[¹[Not Invented Here](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_invented_here)] --- class: extra-details ## Do we need to run Docker at all? - On our development environments, CI pipelines ... : *Yes, almost certainly* - On our production servers: *Yes (today)* *Probably not (in the future)* .footnote[More information about CRI [on the Kubernetes blog](https://kubernetes.io/blog/2016/12/container-runtime-interface-cri-in-kubernetes)] --- ## Interacting with Kubernetes - We will interact with our Kubernetes cluster through the Kubernetes API - The Kubernetes API is (mostly) RESTful - It allows us to create, read, update, delete *resources* - A few common resource types are: - node (a machine — physical or virtual — in our cluster) - pod (group of containers running together on a node) - service (stable network endpoint to connect to one or multiple containers) --- class: pic ![Node, pod, container](images/k8s-arch3-thanks-weave.png) --- ## Scaling - How would we scale the pod shown on the previous slide? - **Do** create additional pods - each pod can be on a different node - each pod will have its own IP address - **Do not** add more NGINX containers in the pod - all the NGINX containers would be on the same node - they would all have the same IP address
(resulting in `Address alreading in use` errors) --- ## Together or separate - Should we put e.g. a web application server and a cache together?
("cache" being something like e.g. Memcached or Redis) - Putting them **in the same pod** means: - they have to be scaled together - they can communicate very efficiently over `localhost` - Putting them **in different pods** means: - they can be scaled separately - they must communicate over remote IP addresses
(incurring more latency, lower performance) - Both scenarios can make sense, depending on our goals --- ## Credits - The first diagram is courtesy of Lucas Käldström, in [this presentation](https://speakerdeck.com/luxas/kubeadm-cluster-creation-internals-from-self-hosting-to-upgradability-and-ha) - it's one of the best Kubernetes architecture diagrams available! - The second diagram is courtesy of Weave Works - a *pod* can have multiple containers working together - IP addresses are associated with *pods*, not with individual containers Both diagrams used with permission.