diff --git a/k8s/kyverno-tls-for-ingress.yaml b/k8s/kyverno-tls-for-ingress.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5e99ee8c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/k8s/kyverno-tls-for-ingress.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+apiVersion: kyverno.io/v1
+kind: ClusterPolicy
+metadata:
+  name: tls-for-ingress
+spec:
+  rules:
+  - name: create-role
+    match:
+      resources: 
+        kinds:
+        - Certificate
+    generate: 
+      kind: Role
+      apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
+      name: "{{request.object.metadata.name}}"
+      namespace: "{{request.object.metadata.namespace}}"
+      data:
+        rules:
+        - verbs:
+          - get
+          apiGroups:
+          - ""
+          resources:
+          - secrets
+          resourceNames:
+          - "{{request.object.metadata.name}}"
+  - name: create-rolebinding
+    match:
+      resources: 
+        kinds:
+        - Certificate
+    generate: 
+      kind: RoleBinding
+      apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
+      name: "{{request.object.metadata.name}}"
+      namespace: "{{request.object.metadata.namespace}}"
+      data:
+        roleRef:
+          apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
+          kind: Role
+          name: "{{request.object.metadata.name}}"
+        subjects:
+        - kind: ServiceAccount
+          name: default
+          namespace: "{{request.object.metadata.namespace}}"
+
diff --git a/slides/exercises/ingress-secret-policy-brief.md b/slides/exercises/ingress-secret-policy-brief.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b7900f40
--- /dev/null
+++ b/slides/exercises/ingress-secret-policy-brief.md
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+## Exercise - Ingress Secret Policy
+
+*Implement policy to limit impact of ingress controller vulnerabilities.*
+
+(Mitigate e.g. CVE-2021-25742)
+
+- Deploy an ingress controller and cert-manager
+
+- Deploy a trivial web app secured with TLS
+
+  (obtaining a cert with cert-manager + Let's Encrypt)
+
+- Prevent ingress controller from reading arbitrary secrets
+
+- Automatically grant selective access to TLS secrets, but not other secrets
diff --git a/slides/exercises/ingress-secret-policy-details.md b/slides/exercises/ingress-secret-policy-details.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f3db5868
--- /dev/null
+++ b/slides/exercises/ingress-secret-policy-details.md
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+# Exercise - Ingress Secret Policy
+
+- Most ingress controllers have access to all Secrets
+
+  (so that they can access TLS keys and certs, which are stored in Secrets)
+
+- Ingress controller vulnerability can lead to full cluster compromise
+
+  (by allowing attacker to access all secrets, including API tokens)
+
+- How can we prevent that?
+
+---
+
+## Preparation
+
+- Deploy an ingress controller
+
+- Deploy cert-manager
+
+- Create a ClusterIssuer using Let's Encrypt
+
+  (suggestion: also create a ClusterIssuer using LE's staging env)
+
+- Create a trivial web app (e.g. NGINX, `jpetazzo/color`...)
+
+- Create an Ingress for the app, with TLS enabled
+
+- Tell cert-manager to obtain a certificate for that Ingress
+
+  (suggestion: use the `cert-manager.io/cluster-issuer` annotation)
+
+---
+
+## Strategy
+
+- Remove the ingress controller's permission to read all Secrets
+
+- Grant selective access to Secrets
+
+  (only give access to secrets that hold ingress TLS keys and certs)
+
+- Automatically grant access by using Kyverno's "generate" mechanism
+
+  (automatically create Role + RoleBinding when Certificate is created)
+
+- Bonus: think about threat model for an insider attacker
+
+  (and how to mitigate it)
+
+---
+
+## Goal
+
+- When a Certificate (cert-manager CRD) is created, automatically create:
+
+  - A Role granting read access to the Certificate's Secret
+
+  - A RoleBinding granting that Role to our Ingress controller
+
+- Check that the Ingress controller TLS still works
+
+- ...But that the Ingress controller can't read other secrets