3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
bircniandsilverwind be90c01468 feat: add size-based cache eviction (#1170)
The cache server retired entries 30 days after creation regardless of use, so a job that ran often enough to keep its cache warm still lost it on a fixed schedule. Nothing bounded the disk either.

Retention now counts from last access alone, and a repository over its limit sheds least recently accessed entries until it fits, enforced on commit as well as on the periodic sweep.

```yaml
cache:
  retention: 168h        # remove entries not accessed for seven days
  repo_size_limit: 10GB  # cap each repository
  size_limit: 0          # cap the whole cache, off by default
  sweep_interval: 1h     # minimum time between sweeps
```

Sizes accept `10GB`, `512mb`, `1TiB` or a plain byte count, binary either way. Leave a key out for its default; `0` turns a limit off, and `0s` does the same for `retention`. Whatever these allow, the cache also sheds entries to keep free space above `health_check.min_free_disk_space_mb` when health checks are enabled, so it cannot grow past the point where the runner stops accepting work.

Supporting fixes: serving an entry stamps its access time, so a find cannot hand a job a download URL for an entry the next eviction is about to remove; an entry larger than the limit is dropped on its own account rather than emptying its repository to make room; and a blob that cannot be unlinked keeps its row, so the next sweep retries instead of orphaning bytes no limit can account for.

Closes https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/issues/1168

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/pulls/1170
Reviewed-by: silverwind <2021+silverwind@noreply.gitea.com>
2026-08-18 15:32:53 +00:00
silverwindandbircni 1d6c6ffef9 enhance: improve config, comment out values in example file (#1145)
`config.example.yaml` now has every value commented out, as gitea's `app.example.ini` does, so it documents each option with its default instead of imposing it. Copying it no longer pins values the runner would otherwise pick, and a changed default reaches configs that never named the option.

`config init` writes the file to configure: a header comment and no option, so every option keeps its default. It refuses to overwrite an existing config without `--force`, and writes `config.yaml` in the working directory when `-c` is absent.

`config set`, `add` and `remove` keep such a file readable. Comments go back to the indentation they were written at, which the encoder drops for a comment block that has no key below it, and a file of only comments keeps its text instead of being emptied by the first edit.

Also rewrote the config docs sections for clarity.

Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/pulls/1145
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: bircni <bircni@icloud.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2026-08-06 05:15:32 +00:00
8700adc933 feat: config command to edit config files (#1140)
Changing a setting after `generate-config` meant hand-editing YAML, which is awkward in provisioning scripts. `config` now edits an existing file in place:

```bash
./gitea-runner -c config.yaml config set runner.capacity 4
./gitea-runner -c config.yaml config set runner.envs.MY_VAR value
./gitea-runner -c config.yaml config add runner.labels 'ubuntu:docker://node:22'
./gitea-runner -c config.yaml config remove runner.labels 'ubuntu:docker://node:22'
./gitea-runner -c config.yaml config get runner.labels
```

Edits go through the YAML node tree, so comments, key order and the blank lines between top-level sections survive — a test asserts that appending a label to `config.example.yaml` changes nothing but the added line. Keys are resolved by reflecting over the `Config` struct's yaml tags, so an unknown key or a value of the wrong type is rejected before the file is touched. The write is atomic and keeps the file's symlink, owner, mode and line endings.

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <2021+silverwind@noreply.gitea.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/pulls/1140
Reviewed-by: silverwind <2021+silverwind@noreply.gitea.com>
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: bircni <bircni@icloud.com>
2026-08-05 16:48:25 +00:00